GSE154535

GEO first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Aging, inflammation and DNA damage in the somatic testicular nic... 2021 · 85 cites

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This human RNA-Seq with unavailable details shows good quality (95.3% Q30) and very short mean read length of 28 bp, suggesting potential small RNA enrichment. Metadata gaps prevent identification.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.002 measured

pct q20 bases 97 measured

pct q30 bases 95.3 measured

gc content pct 47.2 measured

mean read length 28 measured

mean base quality 34.2 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 8.77 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.3 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 34.2 measured ×0.6 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 8.77 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 30 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0