GSE155121

GEO first seen 2023

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

The single-cell and spatial transcriptional landscape of human g... 2023 · 126 cites

Deep data QC

80/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

This human RNA-Seq with unavailable details shows good quality (96.7% Q30) and very long mean read length of 150 bp but unusually low mean base quality (29.1), suggesting potential quality score calibration issues. Metadata gaps prevent verification.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 96.7 measured

pct q30 bases 96.7 measured

gc content pct 34.7 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 29.1 measured

adapter content pct 0.73 measured

duplication rate pct 7.87 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 80/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.7 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 29.1 measured ×0.6 18%

adapter content pct 0.73 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 7.87 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0