← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
What this means
claude:haiku This mouse RNA-Seq with unavailable metadata shows high quality (96.2% Q30) and mean read length of 51 bp. Missing details prevent assessment.
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
98
measured
pct q30 bases
96.2
measured
gc content pct
48.6
measured
mean read length
51
measured
mean base quality
37.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
22.3
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
96.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.9
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
22.3
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0