← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Poison Exon Splicing Regulates a Coordinated Network of SR Prote... 2020 · 160 cites
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
What this means
claude:haiku This human RNA-Seq with unavailable metadata shows good quality (94.7% Q30) and mean read length of 75.5 bp. Missing details limit platform identification.
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.015
measured
pct q20 bases
96.4
measured
pct q30 bases
94.7
measured
gc content pct
47.7
measured
mean read length
75.5
measured
mean base quality
34.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
27.04
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
34.6
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
27.04
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
29 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0