GSE159815

GEO first seen 2023

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Relating enhancer genetic variation across mammals to complex ph... 2023 · 89 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ATAC-seq

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 95.4 measured

pct q30 bases 89.6 measured

gc content pct 49.5 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 35.1 measured

adapter content pct 67.92 measured

duplication rate pct 45.25 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.6 measured ×1 98%

QC cost 36 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0