← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
What this means
claude:haiku This walnut RNA-Seq with unavailable details shows high quality (96.1% Q30) and mean read length of 149.6 bp. Missing platform metadata prevents assessment.
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Juglans regia
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.002
measured
pct q20 bases
98.4
measured
pct q30 bases
96.1
measured
gc content pct
44.9
measured
mean read length
149.6
measured
mean base quality
39.5
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
22.15
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
96.1
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
39.5
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
22.15
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0