← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens; Mus musculus
Instrument
NextSeq 550
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
7 / 7 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
32403955731
reported
total reads
635371681
reported
n content pct
0.006
measured
pct q20 bases
96.8
measured
pct q30 bases
95.6
measured
gc content pct
53
measured
mean read length
51
measured
mean base quality
34.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
7.45
measured
supplementary file types
XLSX
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
95.6
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
34.6
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
7.45
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0