← Dataset search
GSE169471
GEOProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
38/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
HiSeq X Ten
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 / 11 runs
Completeness
54.5%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
54353316298
reported
total reads
511228864
reported
n content pct
0.014
measured
pct q20 bases
76.5
measured
pct q30 bases
66.2
measured
gc content pct
47.2
measured
mean read length
98
measured
mean base quality
29
measured
adapter content pct
0.04
measured
duplication rate pct
25.83
measured
supplementary file types
H5
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 38/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
66.2
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
29
measured
×0.6
17%
adapter content pct
0.04
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
25.83
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
23 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0