GSE171943

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ATAC-seq

Organism

Mus musculus; Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

9 / 10 runs

Completeness

90%

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 381969165892 reported

total reads 1308230002 reported

n content pct 0.013 measured

pct q20 bases 93.2 measured

pct q30 bases 85.1 measured

gc content pct 47.5 measured

mean read length 150 measured

mean base quality 36.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.86 measured

duplication rate pct 83.4 measured

supplementary file types TAR, TSV reported

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ATAC-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 85.1 measured ×1 76%

QC cost 14 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0