Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE17260

GEO first seen 2012

Prediction of progression-free survival in patients with advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
110
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2009-07-22

To identify and evaluate the prognostic ability of progression-free survival-related profile for advanced-stage ovarian cancer, advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer tissues from 110 patients who received primary surgery and a platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy were profiled using oligonucleotide microarrays of more than 40,000 transcripts. We first selected 88 genes by a univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis (p<0.01) and next optimized regression coefficients by ridge regression model usin...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 33 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Kosuke YoshiharaAtsushi TajimaTetsuro YahataTadashi YamamotoShoji KodamaHiroyuki FujiwaraMitsuaki SuzukiYoshitaka OnishiMasayuki HataeKazunobu SueyoshiHisaya FujiwaraYoshiki KudoKohei KoteraHideaki MasuzakiHironori TashiroHidetaka KatabuchiIturo InoueKenichi Tanaka
Reused by

31 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 87