Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Mapping the genetic architecture of human traits to cell types i... 2021 · 163 cites
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human bulk RNA-seq with moderate Q30 base quality (82.3%), the primary limiting metric reducing per-base confidence. Trace adapter contamination (0.54%) is minor; moderate duplication (19.46%) may bias expression estimates. Suitable for exploratory work with QC-filtering pre-alignment.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.