GSE176196

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ChIP-seq

Organism

Drosophila melanogaster

Instrument

HiSeq X Ten

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

44 / 44 runs

Completeness

100%

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 338389924880 reported

total reads 1120496440 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 97.6 measured

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured

gc content pct 43.4 measured

mean read length 151 measured

mean base quality 38.8 measured

adapter content pct 7.17 measured

duplication rate pct 13.21 measured

supplementary file types BW, MCOOL, TXT reported

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 93.8 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 24 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0