← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Aspergillus oryzae
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.017
measured
pct q20 bases
94.3
measured
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
gc content pct
49.9
measured
mean read length
44
measured
mean base quality
37.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
58.19
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 88/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.3
measured
×1
97%
mean base quality
37.3
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
58.19
measured
×0.4
37%
QC cost
28 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0