← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- TFIIIC Binding to Alu Elements Controls Gene Expression via Chro... 2019 · 124 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.081
measured
pct q20 bases
95.3
measured
pct q30 bases
0
measured
gc content pct
47.1
measured
mean read length
32
measured
mean base quality
26.8
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
5.32
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
0
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0