GSE25247

GEO first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Epigenomic footprints across 111 reference epigenomes reveal tis... 2015 · 100 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Homo sapiens

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.764 measured

pct q20 bases 87.2 measured

pct q30 bases 84.9 measured

gc content pct 37.8 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 33.8 measured

adapter content pct 0.05 measured

duplication rate pct 51.29 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.9 measured ×1 75%

QC cost 25 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0