Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE27597

GEO first seen 2013

A gene expression signature of emphysema-related lung destruction and its reversal by the tripeptide GHK.

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
72
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2011-03-01

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease consisting of emphysema, small airway obstruction, and/or chronic bronchitis that results in significant loss of lung function over time. METHODS: In order to gain insights into the molecular pathways underlying progression of emphysema and explore computational strategies for identifying COPD therapeutics, we profiled gene expression in lung tissue samples obtained from regions within the same lung with varying...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 8 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Joshua D CampbellJohn E McDonoughJulie E ZeskindTillie L HackettDmitri V PechkovskyCorry A BrandsmaMasaru SuzukiJohn V GosselinkGang LiuYuriy O AlekseyevJi XiaoXiaohui ZhangShizu HayashiJoel D CooperWim TimensDirkje S PostmaDarryl A KnightMarc E LenburgJames C HoggAvrum Spira
Reused by

5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 53