← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Genomic modelling of the ESR1 Y537S mutation for evaluating func... 2016 · 178 cites
- Many chronological aging clocks can be found throughout the epig... 2021 · 71 cites
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens; Mus musculus
Files available
WIG, YLF
Metrics (value · how obtained)
supplementary file types
WIG, YLF
reported
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.
1 studies use it
1 reproduced mean score 100