← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Acidification of Tumor at Stromal Boundaries Drives Transcriptom... 2019 · 250 cites
- Circular RNA ZNF609/CKAP5 mRNA interaction regulates microtubule... 2021 · 103 cites
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
60/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.491
measured
pct q20 bases
84.2
measured
pct q30 bases
77.1
measured
gc content pct
49.4
measured
mean read length
100
measured
mean base quality
30.9
measured
adapter content pct
0.08
measured
duplication rate pct
9.77
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 60/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
77.1
measured
×1
36%
mean base quality
30.9
measured
×0.6
48%
adapter content pct
0.08
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
9.77
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0