Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE30219

GEO first seen 2013

"Off-context" gene expression in lung cancer identifies a group of metastatic-prone tumors

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
307
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2011-06-26

An unexplored consequence of epigenetic alterations associated with cancer is the ectopic expression of tissue-restricted genes. Here, a new strategy was developed to decipher genome-wide expression data in search for these “off-context” gene activations, which consisted first, in identifying a large number of tissue-specific genes normally epigenetically silenced in most somatic cells and second, in using them as cancer biomarkers on an “on/off” basis. Applying this concept to analyze whole-gen...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 284 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Sophie RousseauxAlexandra DebernardiBaptiste JacquiauAnne-Laure VitteAurore LeBescontAurelien VesinHélène Nagy-MignotteDenis Moro-SibilotPierre-Yves BrichonSylvie LantuejoulMary CallananDavid G BeerJean-François TimsitChristian BrambillaElisabeth BrambillaSaadi KhochbinAurelien De Reynies
Reused by

44 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 80