Gene expression profiling of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
OSCC is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. To identify potential biomarkers for the early detection of invasive OSCC, we compared the gene expressions of OSCC, oral dysplasia, and normal oral tissue from patients without oral cancer or preneoplastic oral lesions (controls). Results provided models of gene expression to distinguish OSCC from controls.
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 96 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed lncRNAs... 2017 · 111 cites
- Upregulated long non-coding RNA LINC00152 expression is associat... 2017 · 110 cites
- Expression profiles analysis identifies a novel three-mRNA signa... 2018 · 93 cites
- Overexpression long non-coding RNA <i>LINC00673</i> is associate... 2016 · 91 cites
- Identification of AUNIP as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic... 2019 · 88 cites
- Salivary metabolite profiling distinguishes patients with oral c... 2018 · 86 cites
- Identification of Candidate Biomarkers and Analysis of Prognosti... 2019 · 83 cites
- PDK1 Inhibitor BX795 Improves Cisplatin and Radio-Efficacy in Or... 2021 · 77 cites
- SMAD4 Loss Is Associated with Cetuximab Resistance and Induction... 2017 · 76 cites
- Epithelial tumor suppressor ELF3 is a lineage-specific amplified... 2019 · 71 cites
70 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.