Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Divergent transcription is associated with promoters of transcri... 2013 · 106 cites
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Mouse 38 bp RNA-seq with severely compromised quality metrics (Q30: 53.4%, mean quality 24.5) and elevated N-content (0.87%), indicating poor sequencing run performance or low-quality starting material. This dataset offers limited analytical utility and requires careful validation before reuse. Caution: contains problematic quality data unsuitable for most standard analyses.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0