Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Long noncoding RNAs in <i>C. elegans</i> 2012 · 230 cites
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Caenorhabditis elegans 36 bp short-read RNA-seq with exceptional quality metrics (Q30: 100%, mean quality 40, zero adapters), indicating meticulously processed small-RNA or highly selected transcript dataset. Low N-content (0.109%) and high base quality support precision transcriptomics. Searchable for C. elegans transcript or small-RNA expression with quality confidence.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0