← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Whole-genome bisulfite DNA sequencing of a DNMT3B mutant patient 2012 · 75 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
6 / 2 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
119999999520
reported
total reads
666666664
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
100
measured
pct q30 bases
100
measured
gc content pct
24.9
measured
mean read length
90
measured
mean base quality
30
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
1.79
measured
supplementary file types
TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
100
measured
×1
100%
QC cost
19 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0