← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
methylation
Organism
Arabidopsis thaliana
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.687
measured
pct q20 bases
60.7
measured
pct q30 bases
48.4
measured
gc content pct
26.8
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
22
measured
adapter content pct
0.62
measured
duplication rate pct
10.58
measured
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
48.4
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0