Breast Cancer Gene Expression Analysis
Analysis of 104 breast cancer biopsies (removed prior to any treatment with tamoxifen or chemotherapeutic agents) from patients aged between 31 years and 89 years at the time of diagnosis (mean age = 58 years). Twenty were less than 50 years and seventy-seven women were 50 years, or older, at diagnosis. The size of the tumours ranged between 0.6 cm and 8.0 cm (mean = 2.79 cm). Eighteen tumours were T1 (<2 cm) in maximal dimension; 83 were T2 (2–5 cm) and 3 tumours were T3 (>5 cm). Eighty-two wer...
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 160 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Survival analysis across the entire transcriptome identifies bio... 2021 · 1,740 cites
- Oncogenic long noncoding RNA landscape in breast cancer 2017 · 221 cites
- A four-long non-coding RNA signature in predicting breast cancer... 2014 · 148 cites
- STARD13-correlated ceRNA network-directed inhibition on YAP/TAZ... 2018 · 129 cites
- The HIF target MAFF promotes tumor invasion and metastasis throu... 2021 · 128 cites
- Overexpression of ASPM, CDC20, and TTK Confer a Poorer Prognosis... 2019 · 123 cites
- Mitochondrial ATAD3A combines with GRP78 to regulate the WASF3 m... 2015 · 116 cites
- Discovery of potential prognostic long non-coding RNA biomarkers... 2016 · 103 cites
- Imbalance of the reciprocally inhibitory loop between the ubiqui... 2018 · 92 cites
- Comprehensive Analysis of Pyroptosis-Related Genes and Tumor Mic... 2021 · 91 cites
- Reprogramming of Amino Acid Transporters to Support Aspartate an... 2019 · 83 cites
- ZNF516 suppresses EGFR by targeting the CtBP/LSD1/CoREST complex... 2017 · 74 cites
- Screening and predicted value of potential biomarkers for breast... 2021 · 71 cites
67 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
metadata only · no data-level QC for this typeStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.