Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Identification of microRNA targets in tomato fruit development u... 2013 · 242 cites
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) 54 bp RNA-seq with good basal quality (Q30: 94%, mean 36.9) but extreme adapter retention (97.8%), indicating heavily trimmed reads or adapter-ligated fragments rather than full cDNA. This dataset represents pre-processed or unconventional library construction; verify trim lengths before reuse. Searchable for plant transcriptomics with heavy read trimming.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0