← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Cicer arietinum
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.102
measured
pct q20 bases
97.5
measured
pct q30 bases
93.1
measured
gc content pct
41.6
measured
mean read length
54
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
0.1
measured
duplication rate pct
16.42
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
93.1
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.1
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
16.42
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0