Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Panagrellus redivivus 76 bp RNA-seq with lower quality metrics (Q30: 67.8%, mean 27.7) and notably high N-content (0.767%), indicating challenging sequencing conditions or low-complexity transcript pool from this small nematode. GC content of 52% is balanced. Represents small-genome or low-abundance transcriptome data with quality caveats.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0