GSE44117

GEO first seen 2013

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Proliferation-Dependent Alterations of the DNA Methylation Lands... 2013 · 482 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.028 measured

pct q20 bases 86 measured

pct q30 bases 81.6 measured

gc content pct 33.9 measured

mean read length 36 measured

mean base quality 32.6 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 78.98 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 81.6 measured ×1 58%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0