← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
5 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
97.2
measured
pct q30 bases
92.2
measured
gc content pct
49.8
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
35.8
measured
adapter content pct
2.59
measured
duplication rate pct
16.64
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 99/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.2
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
35.8
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
2.59
measured
×0.4
97%
duplication rate pct
16.64
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
31 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0