GSE52464

GEO first seen 2014

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Enhancer Interaction Networks as a Means for Singular Olfactory... 2014 · 228 cites

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Mus musculus

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0.007 measured

pct q20 bases 98.8 measured

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured

gc content pct 43.2 measured

mean read length 51 measured

mean base quality 37.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 4.33 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.3 measured ×1 100%

QC cost 35 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0