GSE52742
GEOProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
12/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human RNA-seq with 111 bp reads shows critically poor quality: only 49% Q20 and 42.3% Q30 with 18.3 mean base quality and extreme 35.49% adapter contamination. The 54.2% GC skew and degraded basecalls indicate serious library or sequencing problems; dataset is substantially compromised and requires aggressive filtering or may be unsuitable for reliable expression analysis.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.