Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE52778

GEO

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct 0.052 measured
pct q20 bases 98.7 measured
pct q30 bases 96.8 measured
gc content pct 49.5 measured
mean read length 63 measured
mean base quality 38.4 measured
adapter content pct 0.07 measured
duplication rate pct 18.13 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 96.8 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 38.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.07 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 18.13 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 7 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 67