← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
32/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.012
measured
pct q20 bases
78.8
measured
pct q30 bases
74.7
measured
gc content pct
40.7
measured
mean read length
94
measured
mean base quality
29
measured
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
duplication rate pct
71.82
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 32/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
74.7
measured
×1
24%
mean base quality
29
measured
×0.6
17%
adapter content pct
0.4
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
71.82
measured
×0.4
7%
QC cost
27 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0