Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE55457

GEO first seen 2020

Identification of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients by transcriptome-based rule set generation [Jena]

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
33
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2014-02-28

Discrimination of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients from patients with other inflammatory/degenerative joint diseases or healthy individuals purely on the basis of genes differentially expressed in high-throughput data has proven very difficult. Thus, the present study sought to achieve such discrimination by employing a novel unbiased approach using rule-based classifiers. Three multi-center genome-wide transcriptomic data sets (Affymetrix HG- U133 A/B) from a total of 79 individuals, includi...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 123 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Dirk WoetzelRene HuberPeter KupferDirk PohlersMichael PfaffDominik DrieschThomas HaeuplDirk KoczanPeter StiehlReinhard GuthkeRaimund W Kinne
Reused by

77 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 48