← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomal Mi... 2016 · 599 cites
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2500
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12 / 12 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
93957525550
reported
total reads
986222671
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
98.2
measured
pct q30 bases
94.9
measured
gc content pct
44.1
measured
mean read length
50
measured
mean base quality
37.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
6.74
measured
supplementary file types
TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
94.9
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.3
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
6.74
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
25 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0