Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Localization and abundance analysis of human lncRNAs at single-c... 2015 · 699 cites
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Human bulk RNA-seq data from this study show marginal sequence quality (65% Q30, 72% Q20) with elevated N-content (1.49%) and low mean base quality (24.4), indicating suboptimal sequencing conditions or possible input issues. While the 76 bp read length is reasonable, the quality limitations may necessitate stringent filtering, and reuse should prioritize abundant transcripts over lowly-expressed targets.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0