Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Deep data QC
37/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Rat bulk RNA-seq with 76 bp reads shows poor Q-score distribution (58.3% Q30, 71.3% Q20) and reports 0% GC content—an anomaly suggesting a data quality or reporting issue that warrants verification before reuse. The mean base quality (29) is moderate; the dataset may still yield usable expression profiles for high-abundance transcripts but is not ideal for sensitive analyses.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0