← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Sequence selectivity of macrolide-induced translational attenuat... 2014 · 123 cites
- riboCIRC: a comprehensive database of translatable circRNAs 2021 · 82 cites
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus NCTC 8325
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
15 / 12 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
10059561344
reported
total reads
157180646
reported
n content pct
0.003
measured
pct q20 bases
99.4
measured
pct q30 bases
98.1
measured
gc content pct
49.9
measured
mean read length
64
measured
mean base quality
38.1
measured
adapter content pct
84.93
measured
duplication rate pct
59.68
measured
supplementary file types
TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
98.1
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
38.1
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
84.93
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
59.68
measured
×0.4
34%
QC cost
10 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0