GSE58341

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 10 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

Many chronological aging clocks can be found throughout the epig... 2021 · 71 cites

9 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

ChIP-seq

Organism

Homo sapiens

Files available

BED

Metrics (value · how obtained)

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 96.2 measured

pct q30 bases 89.1 measured

gc content pct 43.1 measured

mean read length 109 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0.66 measured

duplication rate pct 0.57 measured

supplementary file types BED reported

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 89.1 measured ×1 96%

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 100

Generic injuries are sufficient to induce ectopic Wnt organi... L1 100/100