← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- riboCIRC: a comprehensive database of translatable circRNAs 2021 · 82 cites
- Quantitative assessment of ribosome drop-off in<i>E. coli</i> 2016 · 72 cites
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Escherichia coli str. K-12 substr. MG1655
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
99.5
measured
pct q30 bases
97.7
measured
gc content pct
58
measured
mean read length
30.3
measured
mean base quality
37.7
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
76.37
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 83/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.7
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
76.37
measured
×0.4
0%
QC cost
24 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0