Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE62254

GEO first seen 2016

Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies discrete subtypes associated with distinct clinical characteristics and survival outcomes: the ACRG (Asian Cancer Research Group) study [gastric tumors]

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
300
Type
Expression profiling by arra...
Submitted
2014-10-10

Gastric cancer, a leading cause of cancer related deaths, is a heterogeneous disease, with little consensus on molecular subclasses and their clinical relevance. We describe four molecular subtypes linked with distinct patterns of molecular alterations, disease progression and prognosis viz. a) Microsatellite Instable: hypermutated intestinal subtype tumors occurring in antrum, best overall prognosis, lower frequency of recurrence (22%), with liver metastasis in 23% of recurred cases b) Mesenchy...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 213 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Razvan CristescuJeeyun LeeMichael NebozhynKyoung-Mee KimJason C TingSwee S WongJiangang LiuYong G YueJian WangKun YuXiang S YeIn-Gu DoShawn LiuLara GongJake FuJason G JinMin G ChoiTae S SohnJoon H LeeJae M BaeSeung T KimSe H ParkPatrick TanChen RonghuaJames HardwickWon K KangMark AyersDai HongyueChristoph ReinhardAmit AggarwalSung KimAndrey Loboda
Reused by

52 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 4 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

2 studies use it 1 flagged mean score 22