Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Systemic Organ Wasting Induced by Localized Expression of the Se... 2015 · 301 cites
Deep data QC
99/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila bulk RNA-seq with 101 bp reads and good quality (90.1% Q30, 95.5% Q20) supports robust isoform-level quantification and splice junction mapping. Elevated N-content (1.57%) is modest; the longer reads and strong base quality make this dataset suitable for complex transcriptome studies, including alternative splicing analysis and transcript structure annotation in flies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0