Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

GSE65820

GEO first seen 2019

Whole genome characterisation of chemoresistant ovarian cancer [Illumina_450K_Methylation]

Organism
Homo sapiens
Samples
121
Type
Methylation profiling by gen...
Submitted
2015-02-10

Patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) have experienced little improvement in overall survival, and standard treatment has not advanced beyond platinum-based combination chemotherapy, during the past 30 years. To understand the drivers of clinical phenotypes better, here we use whole-genome sequencing of tumour and germline DNA samples from 92 patients with primary refractory, resistant, sensitive and matched acquired resistant disease. We show that gene breakage commonly inactiva...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Ann M PatchElizabeth L ChristieDariush EtemadmoghadamDale W GarsedJoshy GeorgeSian FeredayKatia NonesPrue CowinKathryn AlsopPeter J BaileyKarin S KassahnFelicity NewellMichael C QuinnStephen KazakoffKelly QuekCharlotte Wilhelm-BenartziEd CurryHuei SanSan LeongAnne HamiltonLinda MileshkinGeorge Au-YeungCatherine KennedyJillian HungYoke E ChiewPaul HarnettMichael FriedlanderMichael QuinnJan PymanStephen CordnerPatricia O'BrienJodie LeditschkeGreg YoungKate StrachanPaul WaringWalid AzarChris MitchellNadia TraficanteJoy HendleyHeather Thorne
Reused by

4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 5 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it 1 reproduced mean score 83