Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- Prmt5 is a regulator of muscle stem cell expansion in adult mice 2015 · 123 cites
Deep data QC
21/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This murine bulk RNA-seq dataset exhibits severe quality issues with nearly absent Q30 performance (5.1%), 0% reported GC content (indicating a data anomaly), and low mean base quality (24.8), combined with 83.1 bp reads. The data quality is highly problematic and unsuitable for reliable reuse without investigation of the underlying sequencing or reporting issue.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0