Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
- A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Aging Drosophila Brain 2018 · 934 cites
Deep data QC
92/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Drosophila bulk RNA-seq from a HiSeq 2000 platform produced a large dataset (1.74 billion reads, 145 billion bases) with perfect base quality (100% at both Q30 and Q20), enabling deep transcriptome profiling and low-abundance transcript detection. This high-quality, large-scale short-read resource is ideal for comprehensive expression studies, isoform discovery, and population-level variation analysis in fruit flies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0