Corpus 1,285 assessed · 1,186 scored · 647 reproduced ≥75 · 174 flagged ·∅ 73.9/100
← Dataset search

GSE70181

GEO first seen 2015

Comparison of Hi-C results using in-solution versus in-nucleus ligation

Organism
Homo sapiens; Mus musculus
Samples
13
Type
Other
Submitted
2015-06-23

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) and derivative (4C, 5C and Hi-C) methods employ ligation of diluted cross-linked chromatin complexes, intended to favor proximity-dependent, intra-complex ligation. We previously described an alternative Hi-C protocol with ligation in preserved nuclei rather than in solution. Here we directly compare Hi-C methods employing "in-nucleus ligation" and the standard "in-solution ligation". The results show that in-nucleus ligation captures chromatin interactions m...

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Deposited / produced by
Takashi NaganoCsilla VárnaiStefan SchoenfelderBiola-Maria JavierreSteven W WingettPeter Fraser
Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

metadata only · no data-level QC for this type

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

No quantitative QC rubric exists for this data type yet, so it is deliberately left unscored — this is an honest "not applicable", not a poor rating.

QC cost 22 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0 · provisional — verify independently