← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Metrics (value · how obtained)
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
99.1
measured
pct q30 bases
96.7
measured
gc content pct
45.3
measured
mean read length
88
measured
mean base quality
37.1
measured
adapter content pct
32.18
measured
duplication rate pct
69.46
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 69/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
96.7
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.1
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
32.18
measured
×0.4
0%
duplication rate pct
69.46
measured
×0.4
12%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0