← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
- Pitx2 promotes heart repair by activating the antioxidant respon... 2016 · 277 cites
Deep data QC
insufficient data to scoreStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained
Data type / assay
ChIP-seq
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Ion Torrent Proton
Platform
ION_TORRENT
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
14 / 14 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
25235281092
reported
total reads
207157183
reported
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
73
measured
pct q30 bases
1.4
measured
gc content pct
46.7
measured
mean read length
85.2
measured
mean base quality
21.4
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
34.51
measured
supplementary file types
BED, BEDGRAPH, CSV
reported
How this grade was computed
The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published ChIP-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
1.4
measured
×1
0%
QC cost
7 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0