← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Caenorhabditis elegans
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
21 / 21 runs
Completeness
100%
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
191605884566
reported
total reads
948543983
reported
n content pct
0.031
measured
pct q20 bases
98.9
measured
pct q30 bases
97
measured
gc content pct
46.3
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
37.2
measured
adapter content pct
0.25
measured
duplication rate pct
21.98
measured
supplementary file types
TXT
reported
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97
measured
×1
100%
mean base quality
37.2
measured
×0.6
100%
adapter content pct
0.25
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
21.98
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
14 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0